If you consider the world only have you as a female, your concept is correct. However, there are plenty of girls having good quality in the market. With your conventional quality, you choose to tag yourself at an ultimate price. No men would have the intention put you into their lists as you are overly priced yourself. You don't worth that much in the males' life. I can only say good luck to you and wish you all the best for your single life.
i suggest u to read a post which was written by an american girl. she wrote on a forum which she knew there were loads of millionaires hanging around and thus she would like to ask how could she meet a perfect guy(earn more than 1M p.a, living in downtown NY, driving fancy cars and must be with gd outlook). she claimed herself as a very charming person, most of the men would fall to her but she just cant figure why couldnt she get the one she wanted.
then a millionaire replied her post: I am a fund manager and im earning way more than u ask for, from my pt of view i should be the prefect guy for u. unfortunately u will never be my perfect girl. reason? all of us do calculations, men's value appreciate when they get older while women's value depreciate from time to time. i dont care ur as most beatiful person in the world, all i know is that u would get old somedays and eventually u will not be pretty anymore. thus for us, we are not going to invest in a product that we surely know it would have no scrap value. so i advise u going to somewhere else and give up ur fancy dream of looking for a gd man.
thats exactly wts all about on u. dont dream and wake up. Men know calculation and no matter how gd ur rite now, somedays u will still depreciate and be worthless
占美提到...
回覆刪除你認為你擁有下列的東西嗎？
出口傷人既言辭
自認為美艷不可方物既無知及不可一世
單憑天生要受月經苦既就想從男人身上不勞而獲既貪婪
附加一副『我肯接受你要感激』的咀臉
還有不知自省、自以為高人一等高高在上既愚昧
If you consider the world only have you as a female, your concept is correct. However, there are plenty of girls having good quality in the market. With your conventional quality, you choose to tag yourself at an ultimate price. No men would have the intention put you into their lists as you are overly priced yourself. You don't worth that much in the males' life. I can only say good luck to you and wish you all the best for your single life.
回覆刪除To Cherry：
回覆刪除節錄之前我曾貼於你的blog，問題如下：我認為站於男女平等這個原則之下，我是認同男女雙方尊重並出於承諾，應該私付出。從經濟學理論，婚姻只是「融資」和「財務重組及重新分配」，為何你只著眼提出男性應怎樣，而對女性應怎樣的義務避而不談呢？
另外，煩請你就回覆的提出證據，以證明其論點及閣下所言屬實。單單說的難以服眾，亦難以證明。(而引述例證等這些方式，在預科、大學寫論文技巧上是常用的方法。在下確是希望閣下並非言過其實的。)溫馨提示：請證明以下數點：
6.IQ有幾高?有無120?
超過<----可有作過正統的IQ測試？在下從前曾付費參加IQ測試，其檢測結果為137，請問你可有相關資料證明或提供？
7.有無內涵?識唔識煮飯?
有, 咩都識.<---這個提問其實有缺陷，前提是，請問你對「內涵」如何定義？請詳述以免大家對內涵一詞各有標準。而「咩都識」即是你懂得所有的烹飪技巧？
我媽超過50歲隻手都冇你果隻咁巢咁乾喎
回覆刪除我想問你隻手點解釋？連纖纖玉手都無，憑咩扮名媛呀你？
路過女孩，你係邊度睇到佢隻手張相？Thanks~~
回覆刪除米小姐提到...
回覆刪除閣下已deleted的文中,提及你去買品牌化妝品的地方是旺角.如要做高質素優雅上等人, 不妨移玉步至HARVEY NICHOLS
-
說話刻薄不是罪, 對男人要求高也不是罪,王迪詩也有很多人追看她的蘭開夏道, 問題是她會跟男伴看古典音樂演奏會, 她懂文學,她也會買名牌, 但她努力工作, 她有品味, 她需要愛情但不用依靠男人... 然而也不乏高質素追求者. 雖然王迪詩是個虛構人物, 但這種女子在中環比比皆是. 閣下跟這群女子相比, 有競爭力嗎?
與其朝思暮想有個有質素既男人出現在閣下生命裡面, 倒不如腳踏實地做一個心地善良既人. 不要狗眼看人低, 第一日同你出街就話送Frack Muller比你既男人其實好人極有限.
所有女人都係ga la,都唔明你地批評人地做咩
回覆刪除RE Marcie:
回覆刪除請按我名字的網址
re mark：
回覆刪除此言差矣。
一、並非每個女人都是如此，有無可能是你所認識的女人層次問題？！何以見得是「所有女人都係ga la」？試舉例說明。
二、在下之前已詳述解釋我執著的不是她的文章，而是針對她文章背後的動機和思考模式。詳情可以參考在下的Blog。
假如在下的論點觀點有謬誤之處，歡迎指出討論或反駁。
若言之有理在下定當接受；強詞奪理則恕在下無禮，定必直斥其非。
乜咁啱呀...我條件同妳相約喎
回覆刪除1.我自己有十幾億,屋企加埋有幾十億
2.我有車有樓,不過無車牌
3.自問靚仔過金城武/吳彥祖/古天樂
4.身高185cm
5.我有42吋胸肌
6.我做過網上面D test, IQ 158
7.我中日法菜式都識煮
8.我非常受歡迎,ICQ,msn,facebook...等加埋有1000個朋友
不過我見到妳隻手就唔開胃,而且懷疑妳有精神病,所以我唔會追妳
1.妳屋企有幾多$?咩身世咩家底?
回覆刪除屋企人唔在話題中(但家底呢?)
2.妳有無車,有無樓?
我無車牌, 但我有樓(供左幾多先? 未供晒都只係負債)
3.妳的樣子如何?有無劉心悠/Angelababy(整容後)咁靚?
當然超過(你自評呀? 你話靚過黎姿都得啦,POST 張相先講啦)
4.妳有幾高?有無1.7米以上?有無43吋長腿?
173cm(又係自己講...POST 張相先講啦)
5.三圍數字如何?有無34C-24-34?
私隱(如果勁O既怕咩話比人知....)
6.IQ有幾高?有無120?
超過(又自評....你話你高過愛因斯坦都得)
7.有無內涵?識唔識煮飯?
有, 咩都識.(包括咩呢? 同埋著飯唔代表著得好食....)
8.性格如何?受大家歡迎嗎?
好受歡迎(又自評....我睇個BLOG 只見到人人都唔識意你咋喎)
哈哈。。得啖笑
回覆刪除i suggest u to read a post which was written by an american girl. she wrote on a forum which she knew there were loads of millionaires hanging around and thus she would like to ask how could she meet a perfect guy(earn more than 1M p.a, living in downtown NY, driving fancy cars and must be with gd outlook). she claimed herself as a very charming person, most of the men would fall to her but she just cant figure why couldnt she get the one she wanted.
回覆刪除then a millionaire replied her post: I am a fund manager and im earning way more than u ask for, from my pt of view i should be the prefect guy for u. unfortunately u will never be my perfect girl. reason? all of us do calculations, men's value appreciate when they get older while women's value depreciate from time to time. i dont care ur as most beatiful person in the world, all i know is that u would get old somedays and eventually u will not be pretty anymore. thus for us, we are not going to invest in a product that we surely know it would have no scrap value. so i advise u going to somewhere else and give up ur fancy dream of looking for a gd man.
thats exactly wts all about on u. dont dream and wake up. Men know calculation and no matter how gd ur rite now, somedays u will still depreciate and be worthless
此留言已被作者移除。
回覆刪除